NASTENKA USED TO BE A HEALTHY AND CHEERFUL GIRL.
She had never fallen ill. Had always been a very lively and
merry girl. The disaster came suddenly, like a bolt from the
blue. A terrible diagnosis was
announced: acute lymphoblastic leukemia
FAB-L1,common,
CNS – first acute period (C91.0 according to the ICD-X).
Of all leukemias and its subtypes, this is the best
curable. In other words, children with such diagnosis are
cured with the highest chance for complete remission and may
live to be a hundred, provided they get the right care,
treatment and support.
Where to run??? Where to get treatment??? OKHMATDET!!! Yes,
OKHMATDET is the best clinic in Ukraine. She must be treated
there. This is what we, unfortunately, thought and this was
our fatal mistake. The mistake that twice nearly cost us our
child’s life.
We were admitted on June 15, 2007, it was Friday and the
weekend ahead. There was nobody around and nothing
available. The department was like a public thoroughfare:
open to anyone who likes to enter. The parquet floor in the
ward all rotten and covered with mould. Ragged and filthy
walls. Plaster falling off the fungi-covered stained
ceiling. I did not realize anything at that time.
Later, after I had studied a great deal of information on
this disease, going into nuances of treatment and supporting
therapy, I realized that for a child with cancer such
conditions mean the death sentence.
First examinations started on Monday and on Tuesday
Nastenka received the first pill. On 26 June the question of
central catheter was raised. A surgeon, head of the
department of resuscitation and intensive care of
Okhmatdet’s
surgery centre, Vadym S. Govorov came. Nastenka was
anesthetized and the catheterized.
After the catheter was inserted, Nastenka was immediately
transferred to the ward WHILE STILL ASLEEP. After this
operation the child must remain under close medical
supervision. It was an absolute must for the doctor to wait
until she regains consciousness after narcosis and make sure
the catheter had been inserted correctly. But why should
he??? Govorov must be a self-confident surgeon, as he left
Nastenka to her fate.
Tanya was with Nastenka and noticed that the girl suddenly
turned white and started opening her mouth as if she was
desperately trying to breath in. Tanya went out in the
corridor and said to the first doctor she met that there was
something wrong with Nastenka. The doctor came in, felt her
pulse and rushed out to get other doctors.
She found an anesthetist and came back with him. The
anesthetist looked at Nastenka for a while and then started
pinching her cheeks and call her. Nastenka could only react
to pain.
The doctor Irina Vasiliyevna told the anesthetist to pick up
the child and carry to the manipulation room, but he was
standing transfixed and looking at Nastenka; then our
ward-mate Kristina picked up Nastenka and ran into the
manipulation room.
Doctors started running around and fussing, even Govorov
came back. When Govorov came out of the manipulation room
and met Tanya’s eyes, he shrugged his shoulders, lowered his
head and hurried away.
And, what was the most terrible, in the manipulation room,
which is by the way considered a surgical ward, there were
no medications, no syringes, nothing at all; people kept
running around in search of anything necessary. Nobody would
tell Tanya what had happened with Nastenka. Finally the
child was taken to the department of resuscitation and
intensive care.
As I found out later, when inserting the catheter, Govorov
did not find the central vein. He pierced her artery and
pulmonary pleura. About 700 ml of blood got into the lung’s
pleural cavity. When asked by officials about this, Govorov
said:
- I am a young specialist, with little experience with
central catheters, but there is no one to handle them, so I
do.
The question is why they catheterized the central vein at
all? There was no prerequisite to catheterize the central
vein; Nastenka has good veins and it was possible to use
peripherals. In good clinics, especially foreign ones,
central catheters are only used in emergency cases.
Some words about the central catheterization. In good
clinics, central vein is catheterized only in case of
high-dose chemotherapy or if there are no visible veins,
which does not allow using a peripheral catheter. The risk
of central catheter has to be reasoned and justified. In
OKHMATDET they use central catheters on everyone, from the
day of admission. Why? I think, just to make the personnel’s
life easier. Peripheral catheter must be changed every five
days, seven at the most, if there is no inflammation. It
requires more attention: to examine it from time to time, to
wash and change when necessary, while central catheter is
inserted and left for 3-4 months or even more, and mothers
will look after it themselves. The personnel is happy that
there is no fuss with a child.
As they failed to insert central catheter in a normal way,
it was inserted in an arm, by way of venesection. An
incision in the arm was made. I spoke to surgeons about the
suture on the arm that was left after the incision. There
were shocked. They said “One can made appendectomy through
such incision. To insert a catheter, a much smaller incision
is enough, there is no need to cut so much to pull out a
vessel. This is just one more example of how patients are
treated in OKHMATDET.
Who made this incision? Probably once again, a young and
inexperienced doctor or just a very self-confident one? And
another thing. Who put in the stitches? Was he young and
inexperienced, too? Or simply drunk? Look at those stitches.

Why such ‘professionals’ are allowed to
practice, especially to work with children???
Are our children guinea pigs? Material for
practicing and learning? The stitches left on
the ribs after pulmonary drainage are no better.
They look as much terrible.
We were not allowed to see Nastenka at the resuscitation
department, because of “high sterility standards”. Below I
will write about sterility and hygiene of the department. At
the resuscitation department Nastenka was not looked after
at all, she still has enormous wounds and bedsores on her
head, made by knots and bandages. The child was lying on
bandages for a week and no one bothered to pay attention,
move the child and change bandages so that she did not lie
on the knots.
Look yourself. The picture was taken on 7 October 2007 or
102 days ago. And here are the bedsores after 102 day.

You can imagine what was the child’s head like when she was
transferred from the resuscitation department. If you look
more closely, you can see stripes at the top of the head;
those were left by the bedsores.
Doctors must have ignored that after a week Nastenka could
not even sit, could not breath normally, that she was afraid
to turn on the side where the drainage had been inserted.
Only a month later Nastenka managed to lie on that side for
the first time and told her mum happily: “Look, Mum, I am
lying on the sore side”.
So, Nastenka finally overcame this situation. When she
regained consciousness, treatment of her leukemia continued.
I several times requested her case history. I wanted to know
what medications my daughter was receiving. I wanted to get
advise from other doctors. They always refused in a rude
form to give me her case history.
Now I will tell you about the treatment in OKHMATDET’s
hematology department. There is no possibility to weigh the
child. The reason is trivial: there are no scales in the
department. Children keep losing weight under chemotherapy,
and I think it is necessary to check a child’s weight when
calculating a dose for chemotherapy. But when I asked S.B.
Donskaya about it, she said such calculations are based on
the height. Maybe I got it wrong, but how can those
calculations be correct, if a child weighs 20 kg today, and
15 kg in a week? Still, he or she receives the dose based on
20 kg.
As far as I know, dose of any medication is always
calculated on the weight basis. It is necessary to regularly
check the condition of a child under chemotherapy. To take
his/her blood pressure, measure the heart rate and
oxygenation of blood.
In OKHMATDET there was nothing to take the blood pressure
with. A nurse would come sometimes, bring an electronic hand
tonometer and complain that the device keeps displaying
different figures. After about five attempts to take the
pressure, she would get five different results, sigh and
leave.
As for the electronic hand tonometers, there are not meant
for children, according to manufacturers’ instructions. And
even when used on adults, they may be quite inaccurate,
which is also mentioned by manufacturers. Nastenka was
treated in OKHMATDET without blood pressure checks. There is
no such notion as doctor’s round there.
No one ever asks about the child’s condition, until her
mother goes and asks questions herself. Treatment goes
without any supervision of the personnel. Without any
examinations by other specialists; everything is done by
guess-work. Although the treatment of onco-hematologic
diseases requires strict control and regular examination of
many organs, regular analyses of blood, urine and feces.
Over the whole period of treatment at the hematology
department, they never took Nastenka’s urine of feces for
analysis. “Urine tests” were like this:
- URINE IS NOT RED? ALL RIGHT THEN.
That is, until you start peeing with blood, no one will
bother to do anything.
Chemotherapy was performed in an outdated grandfather’s
way. Ordinary droppers were used, without infusion pumps. I
had already decided to find an infusion pump for Nastenka,
when accidentally learned that OKHMATDET had received a
batch of new infusion pumps, but the personnel was not
trained to use them.
They tried to use an infusion pump on Nastenka, but after
an hour they still could not understand anything and took it
away. They reverted to using ordinary droppers. As a result
of infusions, Nastenka suffered from terrible vomiting. She
threw up all the time and had such spasms that an adult
could hardly bear. None of the so-called doctors prescribed
any antiemetic drugs, although Tatiana kept telling them
that Nastenka felt very bad, that she kept throwing up and
could not eat. They just disregarded her.
Just at the very end, when it was not necessary, our
attending doctor, Oksana B. Tatarina, assented to say:
“Well, you may try Osetron”. As if she did us a favour.
To ask doctors about the child’s condition or any
prescribed medications was unreal. Usual answers were like
this:
- Why are you bothering us??? We know how to treat, you are
not supposed to know anything, you do not understand it
anyway.
As if all parents are idiots and are not supposed to be
informed.
- Is she not well??? Try this or that, maybe it helps. It
does not help? Try another one.
- Are you taking such-and-such medication? You are not???
Why aren’t you?
Because no one told us to take it!!!
Or “are you taking this medication???” looking surprised… -
“they have cancelled it for you ages ago, you must not take
it”
They
had just forgotten to tell her mum about it. There is no
such procedure as scheduled distribution of drugs and
prescriptions. All is done by word of mouth. Buy this or
that and try to take it, maybe it helps…
Mothers have to load medications in droppers by themselves,
have to give various pills to their children: the personnel
is too busy for that. But in fact, it is strictly
prohibited!!! But if a mother does not change medication
herself, this can lead to trouble.
When a medication in the dropper is over, there is no one
around to help, you should look for someone yourself. Now
they are eating, then they are doing something else.
“Nothing will become of your child, let her wait” etc. Total
negligence, total chaos.
Chemotherapeutic medications are given not on the schedule,
but when it is convenient for the nurses. If a medication is
due at 2 a.m., a nurse can put it in the dropper at about 9
p.m., to have a good night’s rest. In the meantime,
concentration of chemotherapeutic agent in the blood stream
accrues, as the interval between infusions is less than
required.
This causes various complications and deteriorations of the
child’s health. Several times they brought medications past
expiry date and tried to load them into the dropper. Thanks
God Tanya noticed that. What else they could have infused,
we will never know.
Medications were brought opened and not signed. Impossible
to find out what kind of medication it was. Always
impossible to find anyone. At 3-4 p.m. they all mysteriously
disappeared. One doctor on duty on the whole floor, and
sometimes not even a hematologist.
Parents are treated absolutely like trash there, they are
afraid – God forbid! – to hurt the doctor or nurse with an
incorrect question, as he would not come to see their child
any more. Nataliya A. Kubalia, head of department, behaves
as if everyone owes to her at least 100 thousand dollars,
looks at everyone like an empress looks at her slaves. It is
impossible to talk to her about the child. I do not
exaggerate, this is exactly how she looks and treats her
patients.
Some time ago, Tatiana often asked the doctors to look what
was happening with Nastenka. Why the child slept with her
eyes open, why her nails were so white and hands were red
and ice-cold. They disregarded her and said there was
nothing wrong, but then…
2 August 2007
In the afternoon Nastenka suddenly got unwell. She turned
all blue, threw herself on mum’s neck, hugged her tightly
and whispered “Mummy, save me”.
Tania dashed to get the doctors, but as usual, there were no
one there. When they came back, Nastenka was not breathing
already. Thanks God, in the ward next door there was a woman
Natasha with her child, just a patient, like we were. She
was an resuscitator by profession and rushed in, as she
heard Tania screaming.
The doctor Larisa Anatoliyevna rushed in, too. Nastenka was
brought to the same unfortunate manipulation ward (surgery
room), where there was nothing, but a bed and a cupboard.
They had to look for adrenalin and other necessary
medications throughout the whole department.
Six times Nastenka’s heart stopped beating. Six times they
managed to make it beat again. The resuscitation lasted for
one hour and ten minutes. I do not know how it was possible
to save the child in such conditions. It must have been a
miracle. Then Nastenka was transferred to the department of
resuscitation and intensive care.
At the resuscitation department there is a doctor on duty
Ivanna O. Borysko. She visited this website from the first
days and, of course, read a story about the catheter. She
grew to hate me. When Borysko saw me, she looked absolutely
happy, her eyes were shining. She took me to Nastenka to say
goodbye. She said Nastenka had had a brainstem hemorrhage,
that it was the death sentence and she was not going to
survive.
With enthusiasm she started telling me about everything and
showing how everything worked. She removed wet bandages from
Nastenka’s eyes, so that I could see the open lackluster
eyes of my child, and looked at me with delight, watching my
reaction.
You cannot imagine what I had to come through. I prayed her
to do everything possible, but she answered that nothing
could be done and all I could do was wait. She practically
pronounced the death sentence, and a place in the morgue was
being prepared. No one was going to take any measures. No
matter how terrible I was feeling, I did not accept this
diagnosis and did not agree to wait. I wanted to use the
slightest chance.
I managed to find Andrey Alekseyevich, a neurosurgeon from
the institute of children’s neurosurgery. Andrey
Alekseyevich entered the department, and after a couple of
minutes everyone started running around, took Nastenka to
perform computed tomography, and it turned out she had had
no hemorrhage.
A question suggests itself: Why no measures were taken until
an expert from another institution arrived? Why did they
start to perform necessary work only after the arrival of
outside expert? There are a lot of different “whys” here.
Nevertheless, Andrey Alekseyevich gave hope to us and
chances to Nastenka. From that time he continued to
supervise her. The next day I aimed at finding the best
neurologist. By all possible and impossible means, I managed
to get home and mobile phone numbers of the Chief children’s
neurologist of Ukraine, professor Vladimir Yuriyevich
Martyniuk.
Vladimir Yuriyevich did not deny my request and arrived
immediately. He examined Nastenka, made all the necessary
prescriptions, and consulted the doctors.
Vladimir Yuriyevich told us that he could not promise much,
the condition was extremely grave, a deep coma, but still
there was hope and chance that everything would be all
right. No one could say in what state Nastenka would recover
from coma, but we had to struggle. Only the fact that I
managed to engage top experts actually helped to save
Nastenka.
Vladimir Yuriyevich kept supervising Nastenka until it
became clear that she fully returned to us. She spent two
weeks in the resuscitation department under artificial life
support.
As we found out later, in OKHMATDET Nastenka became infected
with the blue pus bacillus. We do not know, whether it
happened in the resuscitation of hematology department. We
only know that this infection exists in both departments. No
antibiotic or other medication can fully eliminate the blue
pus bacillus. And for children with onco-diseases, the blue
pus bacillus is especially dangerous and may lead to death.
How can we speak about hygiene in the resuscitation
department, where they claim no trespassers are allowed,
when I personally saw the acting director of OKHMATDET (the
director was on holiday) took foreign tourists to the
department. I do not know if they were sponsors or just
students, but whoever they were, they came from outdoors in
their street clothes and started strolling around, dropping
in wards, talking and pointing fingers here and there. I was
standing near the opened department’s doors and was ready to
physically fight anyone who would enter Nastenka’s ward. No
one did. I do not know who was more lucky, they or myself.
If the deputy director does not follow elementary sanitary
code, such as giving out hospital gowns and shoe covers, can
we talk about hygiene and sanitary conditions at all? Can we
talk about any sterility in the department of resuscitation
and intensive care?
While Nastenka was in the resuscitation department, I
realized that she must not be left in OKHMATDET. They would
kill her. Apart from OKHMATDET, there were only two options:
Radiological Centre and Kyiv Oblast Oncological Dispensary.
The Radiological Centre flatly refused to accept Nastenka.
The Oblast Dispensary agreed.
Nastenka was discharged from the resuscitation department
as soon as she started breathing by herself. Her condition
was extremely grave. She was admitted to the Oblast hospital
in the state of first-degree coma.
Nataliya A. Kubalia, head of the OKHMATDET’s hematology
department, even in this situation did not take the trouble
to make a case record, with all the prescriptions and doses
of medications, including those prescribed by the professor
V.Yu. Martyniuk, that were compulsory for Nastenka. She gave
me a paper with nearly nothing on it.
For 24 hours, the child was not receiving the necessary
medications. Next morning I went to OKHMATDET. I came to the
head of the department and requested the real case record,
as it should be. She started yelling at me that I should not
have come and that she would only speak to the doctor.
I do not know how I managed to control myself… Probably, due
to the thought that Nastenka still needed me. After we had
exchanged some words, the head of the department told me
that I did not realized with whom I was mixing up. She must
have been totally aware of her impunity, if she could make
statements like this.
Our former attending doctor, Oksana B. Tatarina, was
quietly sitting on the couch and giggling: she found it very
funny that the father of the child they had nearly killed
dares to ask for something and claim her majesty’s
attention… Here is the case record that I got initially
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
This case record was made the day after the
scandal:
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
But this record is still too far from the ideal. Actually,
it gives you an idea of what has happened. In my opinion,
all this has happened through the fault of the doctors and
medical personnel. Through the doctors’ negligence of their
duties, through the nurses’ lack of experience.
There could have been overdoses of chemotherapy, incorrect
dilution of chemotherapeutic agents, particularly L-Asparaginase.
There could have been mistakes and infusions of medications
prescribed to a different child. There could have been many
things, but, unfortunately I cannot prove anything. The case
history has been rewritten many times, to make the doctors
safe.
I hope that this story of our treatment in OKHMATDET speaks
for itsel.
14 August 2007
We were transferred to the Oncological Dispensary (KOOD) of
Kyiv
region.
It was terrible and I cannot find words to describe our
state. When Nastenka was being transported in the ambulance
car, we were beside her. To see her unconscious and to
realize that it can be forever was just unbearable. To see
twitches of her body, unnatural head movements, unseeing
eyes without any signs of consciousness… I still do not
understand how we could bear and survive all this.
Even the ambulance car driver, who helped to roll the
barrow, had tears on his face. How we survived the following
two days beside Nastenka, I do not understand, either. To
realize that the prognosis was too pessimistic and that
Nastenka might never return to normal life was just
unbearable. But due to prayers of thousands of people, due
to efforts of KOOD’s doctors and personnel a MIRACLE
OCCURRED.
The miracle, in which no one had believed, except for us,
the parents, and people who had prayed for Nastenka.
Nastenka came back without any losses in consciousness and
disorders in the central nervous system.
At the time of admission in KOOD the diagnosis was:
POST-HYPOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
CASE RECORD UPON ADMISSION TO ‘KOOD’
Those pictures show in what condition the child
was admitted.
As soon as Nastenka was transferred from the resuscitation
department to KOOD, they first of all removed the central
catheter from her arm. PUS WAS RUNNING FROM THE CATHETER!
In OKHMATDET’s
resuscitation department they even did not look after the
catheter. How can this be true? They are supposed to save
lives there, and meanwhile a patient can die from sepsis? I
cannot find words to describe my shock! How can this happen
in the best clinic of Ukraine?
And how can this happen at all, whenever it could be?
21 August. Nastenka had her nasogastric tube removed.
It turned out that the end of the tube was tied in a knot in
her stomach, which caused injury of the mucous coat,
nosebleed and pain shock to the child. A knot is acceptable
if there are problems with inserting the tube, but this must
be noted down and handed over with the child. To take out a
smooth tube, quickly and painlessly, is one thing; and
absolutely different is taking out a knot, it should be
pulled slowly and carefully.
Of course, as the doctor was not aware, he tried to remove
the probe as quickly as possible, to avoid vomiting spasms
and unpleasant sensations.
Another painful injury for the child, which could have been
avoided, if OKHMATDET’s doctors fulfilled their duties
properly.
If the doctor who had inserted the probe, did it on his
child, he would have probably put a sign on his/her
forehead: CAREFUL! A KNOT!!!
3 September 2007
I visited OKHMATDET. Collected copies of the results of
initial analysis of cerebrospinal fluid. Talked to the head
of the department of hematology and TKM, Svetlana B.
Donskaya. She is the main children’s hematologist in
Ukraine, an associate professor…
Svetlana Borisovna does not care at all what has happened
and is happening now. She only cares about her own image and
reputation. She told me that what I write on this website
discredits her department and naturally herself. That she
would do her best to accuse me of slander.
You know, I am not afraid of accusations. I am afraid of
quite different things. I am terrified that the main
children’s hematologist in Ukraine, associate professor and
whatever other regalia she has allows everything that
happens in OKHMATDET’s hematology department, and, moreover,
does not make the slightest effort to provide normal
conditions and human attitude to little patients, and only
worries about her reputation and image. Believe me,
everything on this website is not an exaggeration, on the
contrary, some aspects are put more mildly and not all wrong
actions are described.
I do not have enough time to describe every little detail.
This would make a book, not an article. At the moment I am
describing only what I have seen personally and what we have
come through. But I know an awful lot of terrible things
that they do with children and their parents.
Parents do not file official complaints as they are afraid
of the doctors. But they readily share their problems with
other parents. First of all they are afraid for their
children, that complaints may incline the medical personnel
against them. But this fear itself is the source of such
attitude to patients.
nfortunately no one wants to understand this and the fear
for their children represses common sense. Doctors are aware
of their full impunity and know perfectly well that it is
impossible to sue them.
If you are facing this problem, but are afraid to act
officially, you can tell your story on our forum absolutely
ANONYMOUSLY.
I will also publish your story on this website.
The world must know what is happening in our medical care
system!!